Morrison's Pensions
Thomas Machin Papers
(Terrible handwriting, best to see if Jim Morrison can figure out more of these
lengthy papers.)
Albany July 31, 1779
Dr. Sir
Your favor
of the 27 Inst. Is come to hand. I am happy to find that you enjoy your
health.
Nothing
could have been more unexpected than to be taxed with and attention to your
Letter when I immediately answered then on my arrival here in behalf of my
Father who is a? that time was extremely ill, and since unexpectedly fell
a victim to his disorder—He suddenly expired the 13th of this month and
have left us to lament the loss of an affectionate and indulgent Parent—A
loss rendered still more severe by the situation of the times. You, who
have a sympathizing heart no doubt will feel for us—The dispensations
of In[?]dense, since our Retreat have been severe—that I trust that our
support will be equal to the Tryalls [sic] we undergo.
I apprehend
the Western plans will fall through—and your will return [rest of page
cut off] New Windsor when I shall expect to hear you and be assured that your
favors will be acceptable to Dear Sir. Your Loyal Obed Humble servant,
Henry Rutgers
P.S. The
ladies desire their compn.
Capt. Machin
Can’t
read date or place.
Mr. Tappan
informs me that you have again carried home the old muster rolls there is a
return call for which cannot be made out till you arrive or send the roll the
Adjutant is waiting for the Return of your company therefore don’t [?]
of sending or brining these yourself.
Wave my
Compliments to your lady and believe me most devontly,
Your Obed Hum’d Sev’t Woodward.
The Barracks, 1st February 1783.
Dr. Sir
Your friendly
polite & agreeable letter of the 17th withto came safe to hand, the contents
of which gave me real pleasure but it was mixed with pain, f r it made me reflect
on the length of time that has passed since you have favored me with a line,
I grant on affairs of so much consequence as the Choice of a partner for life
ought & no doubt did take up much of your time & intention, but since
a few minutes in the course of several Months might have been devoted to a
Friend, but is complaining is a disagreeable subject leave it, & beg leave
to assure you and I sincerely congratulate you on your change of Condition & would
be very happy to be acquainted with the Lady whose merit has intitled her to
the first place in so good a heart so that of my Friend Machin, you see I take
it for granted that merit & nothing else induced you to fix for life.--
--
Your
tender feelings for your ‘old Friends’, I highly approve
of, but as for Miss P----- not one word will I hear on the subject I cannot
allow you even to thing----very hard you will say, but remember at the same
time in an old [?] experienced Friend that says so, I think [can’t
read a line] they are so quick of conception & withal so very nice in
that point that a thought of another person once dear to
you hardly escapes them, if I esteemed you less than I do I should not have
said so much on so nice a subject—I am pleased with the prospect of
a visit from you & your spouse pray let it be as soon as convenient for
we talk of removing to the Country some time in April where is yet uncertain. I
have given the contents of your order to Mr. Mr. Nesbit. [Philadelphia
Merchant] And have a hundred
things to say to you but at present am inspired no in a humour for writing
them, so I desire you will come & see us & give me an opportunity
to tell you personally how much I am. Sir your real Friend & very
humble Servant. E. Porter
Colonel
Porter joins me in abundance of love & Compliments to yourself & Lady,
Genl Clinton & his Lady &c &c &c.
New
York 19th October 1784
Dear Sir
I have not
yet laid in any wood for winter as may depend once on your providing it for me
agreeable to your Promise, repeated to Mrs. Clinton when she saw you in Kingston—It
is not high Time that I was supplied This Cole Weather is fast advancing & it
may soon be difficult to procure it, even at every advanced & Since I request
therefore that you will not delay sending it and be pleased to let me hear from
you on the [?] by the very first Conveyance as it will relieve me from some anxiety & Suspense
to be assured that nothing has inter? to occasion a Disappointment—My
compliments to the Mrs. Machin & believe Me your Friend & Humble Servt. Geor.
Clinton
Capt. Thomas Machlin
Camden, May 4th 1782
Dr. Sir
I shall
not make any apology for breaking in upon your retirement at this time—the
intimacy that hath subsisted between I hope will be sufficient—a short
amount of our situation and that of the country is the subject of my story.
A supernumerary
quantity of Artillery & min indered the General to leave two of our Companies & their
pieces at this place—our situation at first was rather disagreeable but
upon consideration that no fault of ours had occasioned it—but that it
was the common fortune of war—Our station soon became familiar—balls
assembly’s & several desertions because more frequent, as our acquaintance
enlarg’d contentment aided the furtive success while with social mirth & a
Temperate clime we eluded the piercing blasts of Boisterous winter--& vimal
flowers covered the fruitfull plain before me thought the verbose [?]
ware half expended.
All nature
now looks gay—the fields covered with virdense and the woods with odouiferous
perfumes & friendly shades afford a [?] from busy cares -- & a fit
asylum for studious contemplation. From this romantic description you
may probably entertain a high opinion of the place—a short geographical
perhaps may at your right.—Camden (or Pine Tree) is situated a mile N.
of the Wateru? River—some distance above it is called the Katawba & forty
miles below on the Junction of the Congru it is called Santa—it then
becomes a Capital River & empties into the sea fifty miles N. of Chalreston & ten
S. of George Town—Camden has been a fine village supported chiefly by
trade The River being navigable for large boats—but is now reduced to
a very few homes it has been in possession of the British near a year—They
had it fortified by a line of stockades round the Town flanked by seven redoubts---in
distance from harbor is about 120 miles—the country at some distance
is little [?] but Banon? fine land but on the river it is extremely rich & well
settled—its situation is rather low and the great Quantity of stagnated
water under is unhealthy—especially near the river there the only good
land is almost all the country below this place has that disadvantage—the
land is rich but often almost the whole face of the country is covered by water—the
army has deficiently in finding dry ground to encamp on--& the method of
cultivating their land by keeping the river fields under water add greatly
to render the air unwholesome.
The people
in general are gay & hospitable The own large possessions but seldom live
long to enjoy them—a man of sixty in the low Country is very rare—here
are widows plenty—Gen. Green lives near Dorchester town by river from
Charleston—his farm is small & very bad [?] provided for—particular
in clothing—but they are very healthy & in good spirits—the
enemy soldiers venture out & desertion are very frequent among them General
Mospree? Is in Georgeia & has gained some late advantages over the [?]
at Savanna.
My paper
tell me I must stop—should be happy in a Correspondence with you at [bad
spot] [?] with you—present by best respects to Gresion, Woodward & all
the gentlemen of the Regt, Capt. Ferguson & McClure & duty present
their compliment to you—they are all they officers that are here.
Believe
me to be your old friends. R. Parker
New York 9th Novm 1784.
Dear Sir.
The wood
you sent me is just now delivering the sloop came down on Friday; but before
she discharged that other part of her Cargo the present Basis return which
I presume has delayed her something—I will give my receipt to the Boatman
(Skipper) for the number of loads and agreeable to your Request pay the amount
to Capt. Flessing on his calling for it which I concluded now have directed
him to do—I am sorry you have been put to by my Inconsequency in getting
the wood down as I could have easilly supplied myself here had I not depended
on being provided by your—It is now however too late and I must pay on
for what I shall still want—If you can (besides what I have now received),
furnish me fifteen cord it will suffice—if you cannot certainly do this
let me know it & precisely how much I may depend on by the very first
opportunity that I may endeavour ton make up the Deficiency here.
I wish you
could procure me a snug Wheel-Barrow & send it to. I want it in my
garden—I am glad to hear your workers are in such forwardness & sincerely
wish they may answer your Expectation I fear most your spending too much in
the first [?] instance & in this case the Profits may not Justify it by
[part can’t be read] the intent for you & care & Laborer, but
of this you [part can’t be read] another with Jude.
How [can’t
read this part] ?reties of different kinds – To ask among you do [?]
continue to dispose of them & what Rate. This is information I wish
to have from different [Can’t read part of it] will you give it me from
your by [?] Conveyance
Mrs. Clinton
joins in Respects to Mrs. Machin with Dr. Sir
Your Most Obed. Servt Geo Clinton.
Capt. Machin
Little Britain 11th December 1784
My Dear Sir
I returned
from New York last Evening and expect to go there again in a few Days.
The Governor
has for some times been wanting a Secretary for Colo. Malher is married and
entered in the Merchantile business and has given me an Invitation to live
with him this Winter and Officiate in that Canacter which I will with Chearfulness
acceptons I think it will be very advantageous to me—
I did intend
to wait on your before I left the Country if you had not wrote to me as I wish
to settle with you in any manner convenient to me—
I am very
[?] it is not in my power to send you some cash by the bearer but you may rely
on my seeing you soon for the purpose also mentioned—My Father left home
this morning for New Windsor and is not yet returned—Please to present
my compliments very respectfully to Mrs.Machin.
I am My
Dear Sir with Sentiment of Esteam your Friend G? Clinton
Captain Machin
New York May 25th 1785
Dear Sir:
You will
believe me when I tell you that I was very happy to meet our old friend Peter
Nestle here and that it would have been greatly augmented had you been with
him—Since I left you I have been at Delham except Six Months which I
spent in the West India. I have not as yet been able to fix in any business—Am
bound from this place to Boston tomorrow and from thence, shall return immediately
to New Haven where I propose spending the summer unless I find some unexpected
opportunity of going into business—Six days a gone I was at Hopewell
and had once concluded to make you a visit but found it impossible for want
of time as some affairs of importance hurried me back to New Haven—I
had forgot to inform you that I live with a Merchant in Boston five of six
months and believe I should have do ne very well had he not have failed as
he was an old friend of mine and was supposed to help me—[Letter ends
here]
Phila Octr26 1781
Dear Tommy
I have long
waited with anxious expectancy of Receiving a Letter from you; but at length
find myself disappointed; & yet cannot account for it—It is time
you may be loaded with Laurels, but from my Observation of Manking I have Witherto,
on such occasions, found the Turk? Run more free in their Pen & their Invention
much Improved:--But candor & my high opinion of your generosity & friendly
disposition induceth me to fix the most favourable construction on my disappointment;
by attributing it to miscarriage; or the great hurry of business in matters
of more importance—but hope with a Leisure Hour presents itself, to be
favoured with a few lines—The great & Glorious News from you Quarter
has gladdened the Hart of every Whig—Discharging of ?non from the Ships & on
Shore Luminations. Fire works, breaking Quakd & Tories Windows for
Non-Lumination: Huzza: Huzza: Huzza: What pleasing sensations must you Brave
Heros feel in making a Divil of the poor Lord & his Army—go on & prosper—peach
must follow—such long strides will soon overtake that bright goodess—my
dear fellow you intimated an Intention to Wed & browse on the Luxuriant
Protuberance of Matrimony; If you still continue of the same opinion, I shall
endeavour to have a Lady provided; that on your return the Marriage Ceremony
may be performed with expedition--- --- --- ---
Province
Island Money is at 1 1/3 for 1 Hard the late emissions at 3 for one hard—
We soon
expect to hear of an engagement between the French & British Fleets, it
is said they were seen within a few Leagues of each other--- Various
are the Conjectures here respecting your future movements, some are so sanguine
as to expect an attack will be made on New York this Campaign—and all
agree that Charlestown must soon share the fate of York—so you see every
thing is planed & you have nothing to do but Execute
I Pray Write
me a long letter—present my most repectfull Compliments to my Brother
Officers and believe me to be with every Sentiment of Friendship & Esteem.
Dear Tommy, Your
Obedient Servt Andrew Porter
Capt. Thomas Machine
“At
a Council of Appointment held at Kingston the 12th of March 1783.
Present. His
Excellancy Governor Clinton, President
The Honble
Jonathan Lawrence, William B. Whiting, Johns Haring (Esquires Members)
The following
persons being commissioned officers in the Regiment of Artillery of this State
in the Service of the United States whereof John Lamb Esquire is colonel and
entitled to promoition.
Resolved
that by and with the advice and consent of the Council of Appointment Thomas
Machin be and he is hereby appointed a Captain in the Said Regiment vice Jeremiah
Wool resigned and that his commission bear date the 21st day of August 1780.”
State of New York
Secretary’s Office
I certify
the preceding to be a true Extract from the minutes of the Council of Appointment
of this State in this Office.
Given under
my hand and the seal of this Office at the City of Albany the 6th day of April
A. D. 1838. Archd Campbell, Dep. Secretary
Charleston 22 February 1810
Honored Sir
You was
so kind as to asist me in the session of congress to obtain a small pension
which amounted to quarter pay of a Captain Lieutenant of Artillery. I
think your Excellence must remember that I did the duty of a Captain during
the warand that in addition to all the hard service I underwent I inlisted
a great number of men into the service. I am unable to transact business as
heretofore. Therefore Request if consistent with your Honor & Duty
you will assist me in getting my pension augmented so as to enable me to live
in something like the style I have All (sic) ways suported my self.
I am honored
sir your excellent humble servant, Thomas Machin
His Excellence George Clinton
State of New York
Montgomery County SS.
John
Bartlett of the town of Canajoharie in the County of Montgomery & State
aforesaid being duly sworn says that he was Fifty Eight Years old in October
last—that he has been personally acquainted with Thomas Machin of Charlestown
in said County & State from the time deponent was a lad of ten or twelve
years old up to the time of the death of the said Thomas Machin which took
place in April 1816 at Charles Town aforesaid—that this deponent during
all the time aforesaid lived within four miles of the said Machin that it was
always understood in the neighborhood where he lived that the said Thomas had
been an officer in the Revolutionary War, and that it was understood that he
was wounded in the said war—that this deponent was also personally & intimately
acquainted with Susan Machin the wife of the said Thomas that they lived together
during all the time aforesaid as man & wife & that the said Susan Machin
remained the widow of the said Thomas until her death which took place in December
1836—and this deponent further says that he was intimately acquainted
with the family of the said Thomas Machin & Susan Machin now deceased and
that Thomas Machin of Charlestown in the County and State aforesaid is the
only child of the said Thomas Machin & Susan Machin now decd—that
is now living—and this deponent further says that he never knew any other
Thomas Machin except the two above mentioned—and this deponent further
says that he has understood from the said Thomas Machin & the said Susan
Machin before their deaths that they were married before the close of the Revolutionary
War--& further says not—(Signed John Bartlett
Subscribed & Sworn
this 3rd day of April 1838 before me D. F. Sacia Judge of Montgomery County
Courts
State of
New York Montgomery County SS. I certify that I am personally acquainted
with the above named John Bartlett & that he is reputable & entitled
to full credit as a witness—Dated Canajoharie April 3d 1838. D.
F. Sacia Judge of Montgomery County Courts.
State of New York
Montgomery County SS.
Matilda
Bartlett of the town of Canajoharie in the County aforesaid being duly sworn
says that she was Forty nine years old in March last—that she was personally
acquainted with Thomas Machin of the town of Charlestown in the County of Montgomery &^b
State of New York for several years before his death—that this deponent
resided within about four miles of the said Thomas Machin now deceased and
that he the said Thomas Machin died more than twenty years since at his residence
in Charlestown aforesaid—That this deponent also personally knew the
wife of the said Thomas Machin now deceased for many years, and that her name
was Susan Machin—that she remained a widow after the death of her husband
until the day of her death & that she died in the month of December 1836
and was buried on the 1st of January 1837 & that this deponent was at the
funeral of the said Susan Machin—and this deponent further says that
Thomas Machin of Charlestown in said County & State is the only child now
living of the said Thomas Machin & Susan Machin deceased was reputed in
his life time to have been an officer in the Revolutionary War and she believed
this it was reputed that he the decd Thomas Machin was a pensioner before his
death—and this deponent further says that she never knew or heard of
[?] other Thomas Machin except the two above named in this location of Country
or elsewhere & further said that she is infirm and unable to attend court
to make this affidavit--& further says not.—
(Signed) Matilda Bartlett
Subscribed & Sworn
this 3rd day of April 1838 before me—D. F . Sacia Judge of Montgomery
County Courts.
State of
New York Montgomery County SS. I certify that I am personally acquainted
with the above named Matilda Bartlett & that he is reputable & entitled
to full credit as a witness—Dated Canajoharie April 3d 1838. D.
F. Sacia Judge of Montgomery County Courts.
State of New York
Montgomery County SS.
Joshua Colgrove
of the town of Charlestown in County and State aforesaid being duly sworn says
that he was fifty six years old in August last. That this deponent has
been personally acquainted with Thomas Machin now deceased for many years before
his death and that deponent lived for several years before his death within
three quarters of a mile of the said Thomas Machin—that it was always
understood in the neighborhood where he lived that said Thomas Machin had been
an officer in the Revolutionary War & that he was badly wounded in said
service—and that it was reputed that said Machin was put on the pension
list before his death—and that the said Thomas Machin died in the Month
of April 1816--& that this deponent was at his funeral—And this deponent
says that he also was personally acquainted with Susan Machin the wife of the
said Thomas Machin dedd and that they lived together as man & wife until
the death of the said Thomas & that the said Susan the wife of the said
Thomas, remained a widow until her death which took place in December 1836—This
deponent further says that he was intimately acquainted with the family of
the said Thomas Machin & Susan Machin and that Thomas Machin of Charlestown
in said County & State is the only child of the said Thomas Machin & Susan
Machin now deceased, now living and that this deponent never knew any other
Thomas Machin except the tow above named in Charlestown or Elsewhere. (Signed)
Joshua Colgrove.
Subscribed & Sworn
this said 3rd day of April 1838 before me—D. F . Sacia Judge of Montgomery
County Courts.
State of
New York Montgomery County SS. I certify that I am personally acquainted
with the above named Joshua Colgrove & that he is reputable & entitled
to full credit as a witness—Dated Canajoharie April 3d 1838. D.
F. Sacia Judge of Montgomery County Courts.
State of New York
Montgomery County SS
Ruth Yost
of the town of Johnstown in the County and State aforesaid being duly sworn
says that she was Sixty four years of age in the month of December last—That
she has been personally acquainted with Thomas Machin & Susan Machin of
the town of Charleston in the County and State aforesaid ever since the Revolutionary
War—that during the Revolutionary War she this deponent resided at Huntington
on Long Island in the State of New York—She further says that Susan Machin
before her marriage to Thomas Machin now deceased was Susan Van Nostrand and
that she the said Susan & her father James Van Nostrand resided during
the Revolutionary War on the Island aforesaid. That the said Susan when married
was at her Brother in Laws at Goshen in Orange County in said State—and
this deponent further says that said Thomas Machin was Aunt to this deponent
and deponent has a distinct recollection that after it was reputed that said
Thomas Machin and the said Susan were married and whilst this deponent was
a small girl the said Thomas said Susan came to the house of deponent on the
Island aforesaid on a visit and this deponent has no doubt of the fact that
when the said Thomas Machin & the said Susan his wife were at her fathers
house as aforesaid as man & wife was before the close of the Revolutionary
War—And this deponent further says that she has always understood that
the said Thomas Machin was an officer in the Revolutionary War—That the
said Thomas & Susan had but two children one a Girl by the name of Phebe & the
other a son by the name of Thomas & that Phebe was the oldest of the two
and that she the said Phebe is now dead, and that the said Thomas Machin the
son of the said Thomas Machin deceased—That the said Thomas Machin & the
said Susan Machin have always since the said Revolutionary War & since
this deponent first saw them as man and wife lived together as man & wife
up to the time of the death of the said Thomas Machin & that the said Susan
remained the widow of the said Thomas with her death--& further says not. (Signed)
Ruth Yost
Subscribed & Sworn
this 5th said of April 1838 before me D. F. Sacia Judge of Montgomery County
Courts.
State of
New York Montgomery County SS. I certify that I am personally acquainted
with the above named Ruth Yost & that he is reputable & entitled to
full credit as a witness—Dated Canajoharie April 5th 1838. D. F.
Sacia Judge of Montgomery County Courts.
State of New York
Montgomery County SS
Thomas Machin
of the town of Charlestown in the County and State aforesaid being duly sworn
says that he was fifty two years old on the 17th day of July last—that
he is the sole surviving child of Thomas & Susan Machin now deceased and
named in the annexed paper and letter. That this deponent never had but
one sister who was named Phebe who was about one year and eight months older
than this deponent & who is now dead—That after the most dilligent
search this deponent has not been able to find any record of the marriage of
his father & mother except what is contained in the annexed letters nor
has this deponent after the most diligent search been able to find any living
witness who was present at the marriage of this deponents father & mother
aforesaid, nor does this deponent believe that there is any person now living
who was present at their marriage—This deponent says that he said Father & Mother
have repeatedly during their life time told this deponent that they were married
by a clergymen by the name of Lockwood at the House of one Timothy Dunning
at Goshen in the County of Orange & State of New York on the 22nd day of
August 1782—which this deponent believes to be true; and this deponent
knows that ever since he had any recollections his said Father & Mother
lived together as man & wife up to the day of the death of this deponents
father and that the deponents father Thomas Machin died at Charlestown aforesaid
on the 3rd day of April 1816—and this deponent further says that his
mother Susan Machin & the wife of the said Thomas Machin decd remained
his widow up to the day of her death which took place at the place aforesaid
on the 28th day of December 183[blot] And this deponent further says
that there was an entry of the marriage of his Father & Mother aforesaid
in an old family bible to them belonging in their life time made in the hand
writing of deponents Father but that the same was about ten years since destroyed
probably by this deponents children—and that it is not now to be produced
but this deponent has a distinct recollection that it was there stated that
they this deponents Father & Mother were married on the 22nd day of August
1782—And this deponent further says that the annexed letter and papers
were found by this deponent amongst the paper of deponents Father left by him
at the time of his death and this deponent has no doubt but that there were
written at the time they purport to be and that they are true & genuine
papers—and this deponent says that no information can be obtained although
he has made delegent search of the said Lockwood who married his this deponents
Father & Mother--& that the Durning family when they were married as
aforesaid are as deponent has been informed & believes all dead except
on son of about the same age of deponent—and deponent further says that
his Father Thomas Machin is the same Thomas Michin who was put on the Pension
Roll in 1808—and when pension was raised in 1814 and that it also appears
from paper & commission in possession of deponent & found amongst
the paper of deponents father that deponents father served as Captain of Artillery & Engineer
during the Revolutionary War—and further says not—(Signed) Thomas
Machin
Sworn & Subscribed
this 5th Day of April 1838 before me. D. F. Sacia Judge of Montgomery
County Courts
State of
New York Montgomery County SS. I certify that I am personally acquainted
with the above named Thomas Machin & that he is reputable & entitled
to full credit as a witness—Dated Canajoharie April 5th 1838. D.
F. Sacia Judge of Montgomery County Courts.
State of New York
Schohary County Carlisle May 15th 1839.
Sir
I now enclose
you sundary affidavits in support of the application of Captain Matthias Brown
of the Tryon County Militia, of this state for a pension for his revolutionary
services. Application was made to you some years since by a Wm. Parkison
for a pension for Captain Brown. For drew up Captain Browns declaration
by the name of John M. Brown. Some of the affidavit ensiled fully explain
the difference, and show that Matthias Brown is the same identical man with
John M. Brown. & the affidavits are verified except the one of Thomas
Thompson taken before Judge Hammond, the first Judge of Otsego County who tells
me his hand writing is verified and is in your office.
I also enclose
you sundary affidavits with certain documents from New Jersey, in support a
pension for the widow Ninel Van Dorn widow of Christian Van Dorn a Militia
soldier in the New Jersey Militia in the revolutionary war, those two cases
I will thank you to investigate immediately and apprise me of your decision.
I deem it
my duty to inform you that it is generally believed among us that the pension
named drawn last year by Thomas Matchin for his fathers revolutionary service,
has been obtained through fraud and perjury. She witnessed who aided
him resides near me. If you will furnish me with copies of the
affidavits on which that pension was granted, I will immediately inform you
whether all is right or wrong. I was intimate with Captain Machin and
his wife and their son Thomas resided near me. If the pension is rightfully
obtained, then all will be right so far, but he has refused to pass over any
part to the other heirs of Captain Machin or Mrs. Matchin. It is
understood here that Thomas Matchin received $4000 to which his mother would
have been entitled, as the widow of Captain Matchin, his mother was buried
Three years ago last New Years day. I was at her funeral with some part
of my family. Respectfully yours. Henry S. Yates.
Washington D. C. Dec.
9, ‘39
Dr. Sir.
Do me the
favor of sending me answers to the interrogations of Wm. Cuming at your earliest
convenience & with as much [?] as possible.
You will
readily perceive the importance of them I know “Thom Machin” well
he is a “Case.”
Let me also
ask the like attention to enclose Letter of Wm. T. Candal.
Respectfully
Yours & c. P. J. Wagner
Johnstown April 30, 1840
Dear Sir,
Yours the
22d received. In relation to the case of Thomas Matchin, I remember that
in 1838 while I was acting as Surrogate of Montgomery county the said Matchin
called on me with several affidavits in relation to the pension you mention. He
also made before me an affidavit reaffirming what was stated in the other affidavits
presented and thereupon I gave him a certificate that the facts stated in the
affidavits were satisfactorily proven. I cannot now recollect what was
the substance of the affidavits and certificates. I have not now the
papers belonging to said Surrogate’s Office, but I think I so recollect
that when about to file the affidavits that Matchin objected, saying that he
must have them all to forward to Washington. I think I offered to certify
to him copies of the same, but that he said none buy the originals would answer
to be forwarded, and that thereupon he took them as he said for the purpose
of forwarding the same.
What will
your House? Do with Garland & Byrum—I think an expulsion or two would
enable you to progress [?] greatly. The scene you [?] was [?] disgraceful. Your
truly T. A. Stoughenburgh. Hon P. J. Wagner.
Canajoharie May 27, 1840
Dear Sir,
Since mailing
an answer to yours concerning a letter from the Pension Department and enquiring
as to the time of the late Widow Matchin’s Decease, I have received a
communication from Mr. David Chambers of Carlisle stating that she died on
the 28th December 1835 and that Mrs. Germain the sister of T. Matchin died
in March 1837.
Mr. Chambers
resides in the immediate vicinity where those persons lived and died and is
undoubtedly correct. Besides I have had a personal interview with a Mr.
William Chambers of the same place and he is confident that the statement of
David Chambers is correct.
I am greatly
obliged for the several papers and documents you have been kind enough to send
me.
Judge Eacker
is extremely low and can survive, as it is tho’t but a very short time. Yours
truly L. Wilcox. Hon. P. J. Wagner.
I have a cert. In this case payable to Thomas Machen only surviving child
of Susan Machen, Decd widow of Capt. Thomas Machen $600 per annum to be paid
up to Dec. 1, 1836, when she died.
Deliver
the certificate to Mr. Machen present. Albany Agency.
Fort Plain August 4, 1840
Dear Sir,
I have seen
Mr. Thomas Machin & he says to me if the original Papers, on file in your
office upon which he drew the money, are delivered over to me for him, he will
pay over the cash—that is to say, he will then trust definitively with
me—What say you to this?
I can see
no objection to this, and if consistent or proper, I wish you would send them
to me, to deliver in case I receive the money.
I have written
Mr. Benton that I was negotiating for this case with me immediately. Your
humble & obedt servt. P. J. Wagner
Fort Plain, N.Y. August 6, ‘40
Dr. Sir.
The letter
you just recd from me was written in presence of Machin. He is not aware
of 2 years limitation & hence whishes the Papers. Perhaps
it may be well.
Be over
time & that debt be recurred by Montg. Over real estate or Judgt—I
suppose & am sure indeed he cannot pay before the 18th. Inst. – If
you think it better to take security by Judge for Montg. Than to prosecute
himfor the money with me—if so, I will not be consistent & approbation
of Benton, U.S.D. Atty—I would insist on paid money at least—of
thought expedient give us full discretion. I knew I would bring him
to his “Mil R”? & I will bring him to the “Mark” (with
interest?) Truly yours, P. J. Wagner. Answer this directly & oblige
him & me.
U. S. Attys Office
Utica N.Y. 16 Sept. 1841.
Sir,
In the case
of Thomas Machin, I desire to be furnished with authentic evidence of the fact,
that on the 5th May 1838, the sum of $3,444.28 was paid him by the Pension
Agency at Albany.
Will you
also furnish me the name of the Agency at Albany at that time.
I am Sir,
Very respectfully, P. A. Spencer, U.S. Atty
Hon. Charles B. Penrose, Soln of the Treasury
Office of the Solicitor of the Treasury
Sept 20th 1841.
Sir,
I enclose
herewith a copy of a letter just received from the Attorney of the United States
for the Northern District of New York, in relation to the case of the United
States vs Thomas Machin, for money fraudulently obtained at the Pension Agency
in Albany New York.
I shall
be obliged by your furnishing this office at your earliest convenience with
the evidence required by the Attorney and also with the name of the agency
at Albany in May 1838.
Very Respectfully yours. B. F. Hensants Clk, Off. of Soln of Treas’y
To James L. Edwards, Esqr, Comm of Pensions.
Albany 21, Jan 1842
J. L. Edwards, Esq.
Sir, We
have finally succeeded in arresting Thomas Machin and holding him to
bail at the suit of the United States in a suit to recover back the three thousand & three
hundred of dollars obtained from the Gov’t by a fraud on the pension
laws. He called on me at this place yesterday and proposed to give a
Judgment from the amount and interest provided he could have time [?] to pay
it in five annual installments with annual interest—The price
with int. now due must be over $4000. The Judgt will use a loan on a
farm of about four hundred acres in Montgomery County near the probability
fix of seven thousand dollars in that a Land times, he says he owes about two
thousand dollars besides near [?] on the farm & he gives this among other
reasons why it will be out of his power to pay the Govt & [?]
Will the
Department inform me what I shall do in the matter?
I will remain
in the city circuit the close of Next week & [?] I shall return to Utica. With
High regard, I have the honor to be your obt servt. J. A. Spencer.
Carlisle Schoharie Co. November
11th 1847
James L. Edwards, Esqr
Sir
It is supposed
that Thomas Machin obtained some arrears of Pension ;amounting to over $3000
as heir at Law of his mother who was widow of Thomas Machin a Captain in the
war of the revolution.
The old
Lady died in December 1835 but it appears that he procured some ignorant persons
to make affidavit that she died a year after [?] to bring the claim within
the act passed I believe in 1836—It is evident that subornation of perjury
was committed and if he obtained the pension in this case upon such evidence
a gross fraud was perpetuated upon government. I wish to procure from
the proper department information & authentic called as to be evidence
in a court of Justice.
Will you
be pleased to forward to me by mail such information as may be in your possession
at your earliest convenience. Very Respectfully, Geo. Bowne
October 13, 1911.
Hon. Eben. W. Martin
House of Representatives
My dear Mr. Martin:
In response
to your personal request of the 12th instant, I have the honor to advise you
that the papers in claim, Wid. File No. 17,081, Rev. War, show that Thomas
Machin was appointed, August 21, 1780, Captain of Colonel John Lamb’s
regiment, Continental Artillery, length and particulars of service not stated
and he was pensioned for wound of breast.
It is further
alleged that he married at Goshen, New York, August 22, 1782, Susanna Van Nostrand
daughter of James Van Nostrand; died April 3, 1816, at Charlestown, New York,
leaving widow Susanna, and Phebe 1 year and 3 month older than Thomas born
July 17, 1764, who were their only children. Very respectfully, First
Deputy Commissioner.
New York State SS.
Doctor Oliver
Lothrop of the City of Albany and Doctor Jonathan Eights of the same place,
appointed and authorized by Matthew B. Tallmadge Dist. Judge & c. to examine
Capt. Thomas Machin, who is inscribed on the pension list of the United States
and is claimant for an increase of pension, being duly sworn report, that on
an examination of the said Captn Thomas Machin on oath, as to the nature of
his wound and in what degree it prevents him from obtaining his subsistence,
by manual labour, and from an inspection of the wound in the breast of the
said applicant, they are of opinion, that the debility thereby produced wholly
prevents him from obtaining his subsistence by Manual Labour. Albany
Oct 29th 1814. Oliver Lathrop; J. Eights.
Sworn before
me this 29th day of October 1813.
Increase of Pension
United States
To Doctor
Oliver Lothrop of City of Albany and Doctor Jonathan Eights of same place,
in the New York said District.
Pursuant
to an Act of Congress of the United States, passed the 25th of April, 1812,
entitled “An Act of revive and continue in force an act to provide for
persons who were disabled by known wounds received in the Revolutionary War,
and for other purposed”—You are hereby appointed and authorised
to examine Capt. Thomas Machlin who is claimant for an increase of pension
conformably to the 5th section of the act of the 10th of April, 1806, revived
as aforesaid; and you are to report in writing and on oath or affirmation your
opinion of the nature of his disability and in what degree it prevents him
from obtaining a subsistence by manual labor; and in your proceedings in the
premises you are to be relulated and governed by said act.
Given under
my hand and seal at New York this 8th day of October in the year one thousand
eight hundred and fourteen. Matthias B. Tallmadge, Dist Judge.
[Handwriting is very shaky]
Charleston the 3d November 1814.
Honored Sir,
I was placed
on the pension list by an act of Congress in the year 1806 and During the Session
of Congress in the year 1814 I made application for an Increase of pension
but by means of my examining Doctors not making their report exact according
to Law my application did not succeed. If I am well informed the proceedings
of my application stand recorded in the office I wish that your honor would
examine the records and if it is found, lawfull that I am entitled to an Increase
of pension from my first application I make no Doubt that you will forward
the business in such a manner that I shall receive it in due time.
I am honored
sir your most humble servant Thomas Machin
Memorandum
On examination
of the roll of New York Invalid pensioners U.S. it appears that Capt. Machin
was borne on it, at the rate of #10 per mo. To the 3d of March 1815 at which
time his pension was increased to $20 per month, to commence on the 29th of
October, 1814. And therefore it is not in the power of the secretary
of War to grant the increase from 4th March 1808 the only money in this case
will be to memorial consays?
To James Monroe President of the United States.
The petition
of Susan Machin of the County of Schoharie in the State of New York respectfully
requests.
That her
husband Thomas Machin was a Captain in Col. Lamb’s Regiment of Artillery
during the Revolutionary War—that he served with [?] and [?] and died
on the 3d April 1816 leaving your petitioner and his children in destitute
circumstances.
That in
consequence of wounds received during the war, a pension was granted to her
late husband on the 4th day of March 1808 at the rate of ten dollars per month—that
it was extended to grant him 20 dollars per month, at the War Office but in
consequence of some [?] in the Surgeon’s report the Committee of Pensions
reduced him from to ten dollars—that on the 29th of October 1914 his
[?] was [?] and from that period he was allowed twenty dollars per month until
the termination of his life—That this provision [can’t read a sentence]
4th March 1808 but owing to some unfortunate misapprehension it did not take
palce.
[Can’t
read last paragraph.] (Signed) Susanna Machin
New York
Mrs. Susanna
Machin, applies for arrearage of pension which she states was justly due her
late husband Capt. Thomas Machin & late an Invalid Pensioner of the U.S. It
appears that the said Thos Machin, was placed on the Pension list of the U.S.
by Law of 25th April 1808 at $10 per mo. to commence on the 19th Mar. 1808
and was increased to $20 per month to commence on the 29th October 1814 by
law 3d March 1815.
It farther
appears from notes made on a Journal kept in the Pension Office, in March 1812,
that the date of the certificate of the examining surgeons (by inference from
which it would appear that the party was totally disabled) was dated 19th March
1812 however this certificate not being considered sufficient the form a subsequent
application was made as appears by the accompanying papers, on which the increase
of $20 per month was granted by Congress, to commence on the 29th Oct. 1814,
the day on which the second examination was made by the surgeons.
The widow
of the deceased pensioner now claims the arrearages which might be justly due
to her husband if he was living at this time, which would appear to be at the
rate of $10 per month from the 19th March 1812, (the day on which the first
examination took place, in consequence of his application for an increase of
pension;) to the 29th October 1814, and not from March 1808 as the applicant
supposes. War Department Pension Office, Novr 7th 1818.
New York Mrs. Susanna Machin an applicant for arrearage of increase
of pension due her late husband Capt. Thomas Machin, as an Invalid Pensioner
U.S. Continental Art.
The arrear
which the party appears to claim is at the rate of $10 per month from 19th
March 1812 to the 29th of October 1814. Award of Congress. Nov.
30, 1818.
Return to opening page of Morrison's Pensions